Quality of Earnings

Reported EBITDA is an opening position. BD Emerson tests the revenue, normalizes the earnings, and documents every adjustment, so the number that closes the deal is one both sides' advisors can defend.
Contact us
Definition

What is a quality of earnings report?

A quality of earnings report tests whether reported EBITDA reflects earnings a buyer can expect to keep after closing. The analysis rebuilds monthly revenue on a consistent basis, removes items that will not recur, and reports adjusted EBITDA with every adjustment traced back to the general ledger. BD Emerson runs buy-side and sell-side engagements as a CPA firm, and the same team handles tax, technology, and cyber diligence, so the findings reconcile to one model instead of four vendors' reports. Start with what a quality of earnings report covers and the EBITDA adjustments guide.

  • Buy-side and sell-side: The same testing runs for an acquirer pricing a target and for an owner preparing to sell.
  • Adjusted EBITDA: Reported earnings normalized for items that will not recur after closing, each one sourced to the general ledger.
  • Working capital peg: A twelve-month normalized average of net working capital that sets the target in the purchase agreement.
  • Defensible workpapers: Support the other side's accountants can test, which is what keeps an adjustment in the price.
Services

What quality of earnings services are included?

Nine workstreams make up a BD Emerson quality of earnings engagement. Buy-side and sell-side scopes run the same testing, and the deliverable is a written report with an Excel databook behind it: monthly adjusted EBITDA, a net working capital analysis, a net debt schedule, and every adjustment with its support.

Buy-side quality of earnings
Sell-side quality of earnings
Revenue recognition and cutoff testing
EBITDA normalization and adjustments
Net working capital analysis and the peg
Net debt and debt-like items
Customer and revenue concentration
Proof of cash and bank-to-book reconciliation
Run-rate and pro forma adjustments

Buy-side quality of earnings

Independent quality of earnings due diligence on a target before you sign. We rebuild monthly adjusted EBITDA for the trailing twelve to thirty-six months, quantify each adjustment, and mark which ones the seller can defend and which ones will not hold. Findings go into the model and the purchase agreement rather than into a separate report the deal team has to translate.

Sell-side quality of earnings

A sell-side quality of earnings report prepared before the process opens, so the first number a buyer sees is one we can already support. We find what the buyer would find, fix or explain it on your timeline, and hand the banker a databook that answers diligence questions in hours. Retrades almost always start with a surprise, so we remove the surprises first.

Revenue recognition and cutoff testing

Testing whether revenue was recorded in the right period and on the right basis. We tie a sample of invoices to contracts, shipping records, and cash, test cutoff around each period end, walk the deferred revenue rollforward, and check whether revenue policy changed mid-period. Deferred revenue haircuts and multi-element contracts are where mid-market books move most.

EBITDA normalization and adjustments

Normalizing reported EBITDA to what the business actually earns. Owner compensation above or below market, related-party rent, one-time legal and settlement costs, non-recurring COVID-era items, and management fees that end at close are the usual categories. Each adjustment carries an amount, a support reference, a recurring or non-recurring flag, and a read on whether the other side will accept it.

Net working capital analysis and the peg

Net working capital analysis and the peg that lands in the purchase agreement. We build a twelve-month normalized average, strip out cash, debt, and items that belong in net debt, test for seasonality and end-of-month timing, and show where the target should sit. The peg is often worth more than a turn of EBITDA and gets negotiated with far less analysis behind it.

Net debt and debt-like items

Identifying what reduces cash at closing beyond funded debt. Capital leases, accrued and unpaid bonuses, deferred compensation, unfunded PTO and pension liabilities, deferred revenue in an asset deal, unpaid taxes, and earnout obligations from prior acquisitions. Each item is quantified during diligence so it gets priced instead of argued about after signing.

Customer and revenue concentration

Measuring how much of the earnings depend on a small number of relationships. We rank customers by revenue and by gross profit, track retention and churn by cohort, review contract terms and renewal dates, and flag supplier and salesperson concentration as well. One customer at thirty percent of gross profit changes both the price and the structure.

  • Revenue and gross profit ranked by customer
  • Retention, churn, and net revenue retention by cohort
  • Contract terms, renewal dates, and change of control clauses
  • Supplier and vendor concentration
  • Revenue by salesperson and by channel
  • Pricing history and discounting patterns

Proof of cash and bank-to-book reconciliation

Proof of cash ties recorded results to the bank. We reconcile monthly deposits and disbursements to the general ledger across the review period, investigate the variances, and confirm the reported numbers are backed by money that actually moved. It is the fastest way to find unrecorded revenue, personal spending run through the company, and books adjusted only at year end.

  • Monthly bank statements reconciled to the general ledger
  • Deposits traced to recorded revenue
  • Disbursements tested for personal and non-business spending
  • Unusual entries near period end
  • Cash in transit and undeposited funds
  • Variances documented and explained

Run-rate and pro forma adjustments

Run-rate and pro forma adjustments are the most contested part of the analysis. Annualizing a signed contract or an executed price increase usually survives when the support is contemporaneous. Cost savings that still require a decision, and synergies that depend on the buyer, usually do not. We separate the two and say so in the report rather than leaving a buyer to find it.

  • Signed contracts annualized with contemporaneous support
  • Price increases effective before closing
  • Headcount changes already executed
  • Run-rate savings still requiring a decision, flagged
  • Pro forma synergies dependent on the buyer, excluded
  • Each adjustment marked accepted, contested, or rejected
Our approach

How a quality of earnings engagement runs

Most engagements run three to five weeks from the day data access is live, with a draft adjustment schedule in week two or three.
01

Scope and data request

We set the review period, the entities in scope, and the deliverable on the first call, then issue a data request covering trial balances, general ledger detail, bank statements, customer detail, contracts, and payroll. Work starts when accounting system access or the data room is live.

02

Proof of cash

Bank activity is reconciled to the general ledger month by month before any earnings analysis begins. If the recorded results do not tie to the bank, every number built on top of them is unreliable, so this comes first.

03

Revenue and margin testing

Revenue is tested for recognition basis and cutoff, then cut by customer, product, and channel. Gross margin is walked month over month so price, volume, and mix are separated rather than blended into a single line the seller can explain away.

04

Normalization and the adjustment schedule

Every proposed adjustment gets an amount, a support reference, a recurring or non-recurring flag, and an assessment of whether the other side will accept it. The draft schedule reaches the deal team in week two or three, before the report is written.

05

Working capital and net debt

We build the twelve-month normalized net working capital average that sets the peg, then schedule the debt-like items that reduce cash at closing. Both feed the purchase agreement directly.

06

Report and databook

The deliverable is a written report with an Excel databook behind it: monthly adjusted EBITDA, the adjustment schedule with support, net working capital, net debt, and customer detail. Both sides' advisors can test it line by line.

07

Defending the findings

We stay on the file after delivery to answer the other side's questions, walk lenders through the numbers, and support the working capital true-up after closing.

contact us

Need a quality of earnings report on a deal clock?

Send the letter of intent, the review period, and the accounting system you use. BD Emerson will scope the engagement and give you a timeline on the first call.

Our Advantage

Why BD Emerson for quality of earnings

Senior practitioners run the file, findings are quantified into the model, and the report lands on the deal clock.

A CPA firm on the file

BD Emerson performs SOC 2 examinations directly through its CPA attest arm. The quality of earnings report is issued by the firm that did the testing, which is what lenders and buy-side counsel ask for when they check who stands behind the numbers.

Findings that reconcile to one model

Financial, tax, technology, and cyber diligence run from the same firm, so the working capital peg, the tax exposure, and the technology spend land in one model instead of four vendors' reports that contradict each other in week five.

Built to survive the other side

Every adjustment carries an amount, a source document, and a clear read on whether it will be accepted. Adjustments that cannot be supported get flagged in the draft, before they cost credibility in negotiation.

Senior people, deal timelines

The practitioners who scope the engagement do the testing. Draft findings arrive in week two or three, and the same team stays available through the working capital true-up after closing.

Reviews

What our customers say

Great consulting firms for scaling security, compliance, and appsec.

Outstanding partner in Technical and Cyber Due Diligence

Appsec maturity and application hardening.

BD Emerson helped us simplfiy our compliance management.

BD Emerson did such a phenomenal job. What started as privacy support quickly became a full partnership across compliance, engineering, and even business operations. They’re embedded with our team. They understand our product. They move fast. They’re simply invaluable.

Adam Ben Jacobs

CTO @ OneStep GPS

Great consulting firms for scaling security, compliance, and appsec.

Outstanding partner in Technical and Cyber Due Diligence

Appsec maturity and application hardening.

BD Emerson helped us simplfiy our compliance management.

BD Emerson did such a phenomenal job. What started as privacy support quickly became a full partnership across compliance, engineering, and even business operations. They’re embedded with our team. They understand our product. They move fast. They’re simply invaluable.

Adam Ben Jacobs

CTO @ OneStep GPS

We had a hard time finding the right company to partner with in support of our compliance journey. Some vendors sell the idea that they do the work, but then you end up doing everything. The ambiguity is what killed our last project. BD Emerson’s team has such great technical knowledge and understands the standard so well that they made us comfortable with moving fast. This has led to us closing major enterprise customers that were previously out of reach because of security and compliance.

Tom Watkins

CEO @ AMI AssetTrack

Lead an enterprise initiative to overhaul the organization's technology stack from ecommerce, corporate tech, and corporate security.

Supported ISO 42001 exercise and served as internal auditor.

Rubrik's privacy and compliance team began with the backbone of BD Emerson. BD Emerson supported building out the privacy program, GRC (ISO 27001, SOC 2, CMMC, FedRAMP), and the appsec function.

We needed a partner who could move quickly, without sacrificing precision. BD Emerson brought the expertise, structure, and speed we were looking for. Their team became an extension of ours, embedding themselves across the organization, guiding us step by step, and giving us confidence in areas we hadn’t tackled before. The internal audit they conducted was so detailed that even the external auditors called it out. Achieving ISO 27001 with zero nonconformities says everything you need to know about the quality of the partnership.

Walid Souilem

CTO @ FGI Worldwide

We had a hard time finding the right company to partner with in support of our compliance journey. Some vendors sell the idea that they do the work, but then you end up doing everything. The ambiguity is what killed our last project. BD Emerson’s team has such great technical knowledge and understands the standard so well that they made us comfortable with moving fast. This has led to us closing major enterprise customers that were previously out of reach because of security and compliance.

Tom Watkins

CEO @ AMI AssetTrack

Lead an enterprise initiative to overhaul the organization's technology stack from ecommerce, corporate tech, and corporate security.

Supported ISO 42001 exercise and served as internal auditor.

Rubrik's privacy and compliance team began with the backbone of BD Emerson. BD Emerson supported building out the privacy program, GRC (ISO 27001, SOC 2, CMMC, FedRAMP), and the appsec function.

We needed a partner who could move quickly, without sacrificing precision. BD Emerson brought the expertise, structure, and speed we were looking for. Their team became an extension of ours, embedding themselves across the organization, guiding us step by step, and giving us confidence in areas we hadn’t tackled before. The internal audit they conducted was so detailed that even the external auditors called it out. Achieving ISO 27001 with zero nonconformities says everything you need to know about the quality of the partnership.

Walid Souilem

CTO @ FGI Worldwide

BD Emerson didn’t just help us meet our compliance goals; they integrated security and privacy into the core of our operations. I highly recommend BD Emerson to anyone seeking SOC 2 or GDPR compliance, or simply looking to enhance their security team and boost customer trust in their product and services. Their dedication and expertise have been invaluable to our success.

Padraig Reilly

CEO, Boxcore

BD Emerson understood our business requirements and worked side-by-side with us. The policies and controls we developed together not only meet compliance standards but improve how we operate day to day.

Matt Meierdierks

IT Manager, Lincoln Industries

From day one, BD Emerson brought urgency, clarity, and a sharp understanding of what truly matters to our business — earning and keeping customer trust. They went beyond helping us meet compliance requirements; they helped build a foundation for secure, scalable growth. That kind of partnership is rare.

Jason Marker

CEO @ LifeLenz

BD Emerson didn’t just help us pass an audit—they helped us build a sustainable culture of security.

Alexey Indeev

CTO Spare

BD Emerson was essential in helping our company navigate the daunting process of leveling up our security infrastructure. BD Emerson’s impressive expertise and confidence throughout the process helped our team exceed HIPAA and SOC 2 Type 1 standards quickly, distilling what can be an overwhelming process into a streamlined, organized effort. From day one they began adding value and getting us on course. With their help we delivered on a massive security overhaul with both extreme efficiency and thorough attention to details. Because of BD Emerson’s support, we’ve increased our clients’ trust in Titan Intake and the life-changing work it accomplishes for those seeking specialist referrals.

Patrick Bruce

CEO, Titan Intake

BD Emerson didn’t just help us meet our compliance goals; they integrated security and privacy into the core of our operations. I highly recommend BD Emerson to anyone seeking SOC 2 or GDPR compliance, or simply looking to enhance their security team and boost customer trust in their product and services. Their dedication and expertise have been invaluable to our success.

Padraig Reilly

CEO, Boxcore

BD Emerson understood our business requirements and worked side-by-side with us. The policies and controls we developed together not only meet compliance standards but improve how we operate day to day.

Matt Meierdierks

IT Manager, Lincoln Industries

From day one, BD Emerson brought urgency, clarity, and a sharp understanding of what truly matters to our business — earning and keeping customer trust. They went beyond helping us meet compliance requirements; they helped build a foundation for secure, scalable growth. That kind of partnership is rare.

Jason Marker

CEO @ LifeLenz

BD Emerson didn’t just help us pass an audit—they helped us build a sustainable culture of security.

Alexey Indeev

CTO Spare

BD Emerson was essential in helping our company navigate the daunting process of leveling up our security infrastructure. BD Emerson’s impressive expertise and confidence throughout the process helped our team exceed HIPAA and SOC 2 Type 1 standards quickly, distilling what can be an overwhelming process into a streamlined, organized effort. From day one they began adding value and getting us on course. With their help we delivered on a massive security overhaul with both extreme efficiency and thorough attention to details. Because of BD Emerson’s support, we’ve increased our clients’ trust in Titan Intake and the life-changing work it accomplishes for those seeking specialist referrals.

Patrick Bruce

CEO, Titan Intake

Certificates

Our accreditations

At BD Emerson, we believe that our team's extensive certifications not only set us apart but also ensure that we provide the highest level of service to our clients.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is a quality of earnings report?

How is a quality of earnings report different from an audit?

What does a quality of earnings report cost?

How long does a quality of earnings report take?

What is the difference between buy-side and sell-side quality of earnings?

Which quality of earnings adjustments get rejected?

Will a lender accept a quality of earnings report?

What data does the team need?

What happens if the quality of earnings work finds a problem?

How does quality of earnings work connect to the working capital peg?

Who signs the quality of earnings report?

Blog

Related Articles

Insights on strategy, transactions, technology, security, and compliance from BD Emerson's practitioners